国際刑事裁判所(ICC)と日本 [はてな版]

人間の安全保障の発展に貢献する日本と世界の道筋と行く末を見つめます。

【英文】「非常事態宣言に関するフィリピン人権擁護者連合の声明文」(2006.02.24)

No To Proclamation 1017
  February 24, 2005


It is ironic that as we commemorated the 20th anniversary of the People
Power Revolt that ended the tyranny of Ferdinand Marcos, the usurper at
Malacanang chose to declare a state of national emergency.  Proclamation
1017 of Gloria Macapagal Arroyo bears striking resemblance to Proclamation
1081 which placed the entire nation in martial law in 1972.

While the guidelines that will explain the scope and extent of Proclamation
1017 is yet to be issued by Malacanang we in the human rights community feel
there is reason to fear the ominous timing and political context in which
the proclamation came into being.

Even before yesterday's declaration the Arroyo administration has already
been clamping down on legitimate dissent.  The defeat of the impeachment
proceedings in Congress and the growing protest actions calling for Mrs.
Arroyo's ouster from office has led to the implementation of the calibrated
preemptive response policy and EO 464 both of which are aimed at suppressing
the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of expression and assembly.

Now, with the issuance of Proclamation 1017 our country is put in a state of
"de facto" martial rule where force, violence,  and deceit are supreme.  It
is an unconstitutional  and illegal proclamation since Section 18, Article
VII of the Constitution only provides for the declaration of martial law and
not of a state of national emergency.


Arroyo knew only too well that an outright declaration of martial law will
mean a congressional  approval and may court further opposition. To avoid
these "inconveniences" Arroyo managed to twist the legal system and avoid
the necessary congressional approval by giving it a new name.

And the similarity between Arroyo's proclamation 1017 and Marcos's
Proclamation 1081 is quite uncanny.  Both Presidents have declared both
proclamations under the pretext of a threat against the Republic - for
Marcos it was the growing communist threat, while Arroyo it is both  the
communist and rightist threat.  Both of them also cited incidents to prove
that a threat exists - Marcos cited the ambush of then Defense Minister Sen.
Juan Ponce Enrile, while Arroyo is citing the coup threat allegedly led by
Brigadier General Danilo Lim.  And now like Marcos before her Arroyo is
using Proclamation 1017 to perpetuate her hold to power.


The  government is saying that the people have nothing to fear from the
Proclamation 1017 and that its issuance is will not mean a curtailment of
civil and political rights.  But as of midnight the offices of the Daily
Tribune has been raided and there are now charges being filed against Laban
ng Masa Chairperson and former UP President Ka Dodong Nemenzo.  Just
yesterday rallyist were violently dispersed and arbitrarily arrested by
intelligence operatives wearing plainclothes similar to the situation during
martial law.

We call on the people to be more vigilant, and act against any form of
tyranny and oppression.  Never again should we let our freedoms be taken
from us.  Our salvation and liberation lies in our own hands.  There is no
other recourse but to stand our ground and face the challenges.


When the acts of the state close all peaceful avenues for meaningful change,
the people have no recourse but to exercise their right to rebel provided
for in the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights..


Philippine Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA)